Friday, July 24, 2015

[MFP] RE: Forum for Social Economics - Special Edition on Microcredit

 

Readers might be interested in casting a glance at the journal Forum for Social Economics, which has a Special Edition on Microcredit just out and for which I was the invited guest editor. The Special Edition contains the following contributions:
 
 
Introduction
Milford Bateman
 
Microfinance Control Fraud in Latin America
Will Butcher and James K Galbraith
 
South Africa's post-apartheid microcredit experiment: moving from state-enforced to market-enforced exploitation
Milford Bateman
 
All Myth and Ceremony? Examining the Causes and Logic of the Mission Shift in Microfinance from Microenterprise Credit to Financial Inclusion
Philip Mader and Sophia Sabrow
 
Debtfarism and the Violence of Financial Inclusion: The Case of the Payday Lending Industry
Jesse Hembruff and Susanne Soederberg
 

Milford Bateman

__._,_.___

Posted by: milford bateman <milfordbateman@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
WARNING! If you hit REPLY, your message will go to the entire listserve, not just the original author!

.

__,_._,___

Monday, July 20, 2015

[MFP] Survey: client outcomes

 

Mission Measurement invites you to take part in our survey of microfinance experts around social outcomes in Microfinance. As we seek to better understand the effectiveness of different kinds of financial products and services, your participation in this survey will provide us with valuable first-hand knowledge of how these financial tools affect people's lives. This information will help us understand how financial products and services can produce positive social outcomes for clients and their communities and will be an integral part of the Microfinance Impact Genome Project.

We have two different surveys; either takes about 15 minutes to complete.

 

The first survey is for employees of microfinance and other related financial institutions. We are particularly interested in hearing from people with 2 or more years of experience working directly with clients, savings groups, etc.


English
http://survey.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_56Js9wBv0pFV4S9
French
http://survey.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_eKeWx0bBdgJ1hTT
Spanish
http://survey.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_3eKN22g1CaJGNlX

The second survey is for professionals who support the work of microfinance and other financial institutions. This includes, but is not limited to researchers, donors, investors, raters, board members, and other technical assistance providers.

 

English: http://survey.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_6Ez5SrX7NuiGjGd

French: http://survey.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_3w54yhfUAt2WMAJ

Spanish: http://survey.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_0ufNQRGNb4NW5hz

 

The survey will remain open through Thursday 23 July. If you have already participated in this survey, thank you! Feel free to forward these links to your networks.

Please email Margaret Richards, Research Director, Microfinance Impact Genome Project (mrichards@missionmeasurement.com) with any questions. More information on the MF IGP can be found on the website for the 2015 SPTF Annual Meeting.  A new IGP website is coming soon!


__._,_.___

Posted by: margaretelise@gmail.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
WARNING! If you hit REPLY, your message will go to the entire listserve, not just the original author!

.

__,_._,___

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

[MFP] Accion and CFI Launch Fellows Program

 

Colleagues,

 

Accion and the Center for Financial Inclusion have launched a new Fellows program to support research and thought leadership in financial inclusion. The program encourages independent researchers to conduct analysis on topics of high importance to financial inclusion, producing papers to be published by Accion and the CFI.  Compensation will be appropriate to assignment scope and researchers’ seniority.  For more information, please go here.

 

Regards,

Bruce

 

Bruce J. MacDonald | SVP, Communications | Accion | 10 Fawcett Street, Suite 204, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA

Tel +1 617.625.7080, x.1245 | Fax +1 617.625.7020 | bmacdonald@accion.org | www.accion.org | skype: bruce.j.macdonald |@accion_global

 

 

 

__._,_.___

Posted by: Bruce MacDonald <bmacdonald@accion.org>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
WARNING! If you hit REPLY, your message will go to the entire listserve, not just the original author!

.

__,_._,___

Wednesday, July 8, 2015

Re: [MFP] APR/EIR calculation using MFT Pricing Tool [1 Attachment]

 

Hello Awais,


I'll give you some short answers on your questions, and with some follow-up work, everything should be clear.  For others on the listserve, Awais is using my Price Calculator software that can be downloaded here:


Much of pricing has to do with definitions, and that is where I think most of your questions come from.

First, and UPFRONT FEE is one that is paid at disbursement, before getting the loan, or right at the moment of getting the loan.  Upfront fees show up for Period 0 in the model.  Upfront fees do not affect the amounts paid starting in Period 1.  If there is a fee that the client pays with each payment, that is called an ONGOING FEE in the pricing calculator.

The amount paid each month isn't affected by fees, but there are issues that determine the amount each month.  The tool allows you to indicate "equal installments (amortized)" up in the dropdown in H3.  This would give you the same amount each month, as you indicate.  If you chose "equal principal" from that dropdown, you would get unequal payments each month if the product had declining balance interest, because the amount of interest each payment would reduce.

As for the PERIOD column (Col H), that is the IRR (internal Rate of Return) based for the "period" — the amount of time between payments.  Maybe a week, maybe a month.  The software takes the period rate and converts it to an annual rate (APR and EIR columns).

As for the INCREMENT column (Col G), that is the DIFFERENCE between the APR figures for the current row and the preceding row.  For example, if the loan shows an APR (interest) of 40% and an APR (interest + fees) of 42%, then the INCREMENT is 2%.  This calculation shows you how much impact each price component has on the overall price.

Attached is a snapshot of an example as I'm describing.  I hope this answers your questions, and if not, let me know.

Chuck



On Jul 8, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Muhammad Awais mawaisq@hotmail.com [MicrofinancePractice] <MicrofinancePractice@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


Hi,

I am using the MFT pricing tool to calculate the APR/EIR. 

I have noticed that equal installment is constant irrespective of increasing/decreasing/deleting the upfront fee. For example a 12 months loan of USD1,000 @ 1% per month with USD10 upfront fee has (equal) installment of USD88.85 and this installment amount remains the same without the upfront fee.Should the equal installment size has some relationship with the upfront fee? 

I will be thankful if someone can explain followings in the MFT pricing tool:

1) How increment (G13) is being calculated for upfront fee?

2) How period (H9) is being calculated and why its results are in %?


Regards

Awais

 

   




__._,_.___
View attachments on the web

Posted by: Chuck Waterfield <waterfield@microfin.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (14)

Check out the automatic photo album with 1 photo(s) from this topic.
PastedGraphic-1.png

WARNING! If you hit REPLY, your message will go to the entire listserve, not just the original author!

.

__,_._,___

[MFP] APR/EIR calculation using MFT Pricing Tool

 

Hi,

I am using the MFT pricing tool to calculate the APR/EIR. 

I have noticed that equal installment is constant irrespective of increasing/decreasing/deleting the upfront fee. For example a 12 months loan of USD1,000 @ 1% per month with USD10 upfront fee has (equal) installment of USD88.85 and this installment amount remains the same without the upfront fee.Should the equal installment size has some relationship with the upfront fee? 

I will be thankful if someone can explain followings in the MFT pricing tool:

1) How increment (G13) is being calculated for upfront fee?

2) How period (H9) is being calculated and why its results are in %?


Regards

Awais

 

   


__._,_.___

Posted by: Muhammad Awais <mawaisq@hotmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (13)
WARNING! If you hit REPLY, your message will go to the entire listserve, not just the original author!

.

__,_._,___

Saturday, July 4, 2015

Re: [MFP] Islamic microfinance - call for cases [4 Attachments]

 

Dear Muneer,
 
I am attaching a few items which may be useful. If you need anything more specific, let me know, and I'll see if I can help.
 
Malcolm Harper
 
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2015 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: [MFP] Islamic microfinance - call for cases
 
 

Dear sir,
I would like to know more about Islamic MFI. Could you please send an article on Islamic MFI.
Regards
Muneer
 

From: MALCOLM HARPER malcolm.harper@btinternet.com [MicrofinancePractice] <MicrofinancePractice@yahoogroups.com>;
To: MicrofinancePractice@yahoogroups.com <MicrofinancePractice@yahoogroups.com>;
Subject: [MFP] Islamic microfinance - call for cases
Sent: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 10:34:05 PM

 
Dear Colleagues,
 
Islamic microfinance is growing rapidly, but is nowhere near meeting the demand. The existing material on the subject tends either to be wholly theoretical, or promotional, or naïve; there is a need for more information on what actually is being done, which products 'work' and which don't, and what are the results.
 
I am therefore putting together a collection of short 8-10 page case studies about actual Islamic MFIs, which will be published in a book and will also be disseminated on-line, through presentations at conferences and by other means.
 
If you know of a functioning Islamic MFI, and would be interested in preparing such a case study about it, or if any of your colleagues might be interested, please let me know. I shall then send you more details about what is required.
 
Many thanks,
 
Malcolm Harper
 
 

__._,_.___
View attachments on the web

Posted by: "Malcolm Harper" <malcolm.harper@btinternet.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (11)
WARNING! If you hit REPLY, your message will go to the entire listserve, not just the original author!

.

__,_._,___

Friday, July 3, 2015

[MFP] interesting article from American Banker

 

Why Payment Firms See Opportunity in Small-Business Lending

When mom-and-pop merchants need a loan, they are increasingly turning to some big names in the payments business, which are quickly becoming noteworthy players in small-business lending.

Within the last three years, PayPal, Amazon and Square have all begun offering credit to their existing business customers. American Express, which historically straddled the line between payments and lending, is also competing for these commercial borrowers.

The volume of this type of merchant financing remains relatively small for now. But it is growing fast, as payment firms take advantage of a short-term credit environment that is favorable to lenders, as well as the long-term growth in electronic payments and their own central role in that trend.

What makes these new loan products from payment companies different from what came before is that in order to qualify for credit, a merchant must process transactions on the lender's network.

That mandatory relationship gives companies like PayPal and AmEx two advantages over banks, marketplace lenders and other competitors in small-business lending.

First, the payment networks have instantaneous access to a plethora of sales data, which is useful during the underwriting process.

[Coming this November: Marketplace Lending + Investing. Hear how participants in this fast-growth niche are using data and technology to propel lending into the 21st century.]

"Traditional banks may not see, and most of them don't see, spending on a monthly, daily and within-a-day basis," said Ed Jay, an executive vice president of merchant services at Amex. "We feel like we can predict in a better way who is going to pay back their loans."

Second, the payment companies have the ability to deduct loan repayments directly from the revenue they collect on behalf of the merchants. That reduces the risk of default.

These advantages seem likely to grow over time. That is because an increasing share of payments are being processed electronically. In the U.S., retail e-commerce sales totaled 7% of total retail sales in the first quarter of this year, up from around 3% in 2006, according to Census data.

"As more payments are processed through electronic rails, financial institutions' visibility into individuals' and businesses' cash flow and spending patterns will increase, improving their ability to extend loans to customers previously less understood," the World Economic Forum, which hosts the annual summit of business and political leaders in Davos, Switzerland, stated in a report released earlier this week.

PayPal, which processes payments for sellers on eBay, launched its Working Capital product in the U.S. in 2013. The company started offering similar loans to merchants in the U.K. and Australia late last year.

PayPal now distributes more than $2 million per day in loans to merchants, according to Darrell Esch, its vice president of small-business lending. That is more than double the company's loan volume in July 2014.

For small businesses that borrow from PayPal, speed and convenience are key selling points. When business owners apply for credit, they select the percentage of their daily PayPal sales — from 10%-30% — that they want to pay toward the loans. Because PayPal already has a lot of information about its business customers, the application process typically only takes about 3-5 minutes, Esch said.

"The funding happens instantly," he added. "By the time they toggle over to look at their PayPal account, the funds are already there."

New York-based American Express launched its Merchant Financing product in 2011. Last year the company extended just under $1 billion in credit as part of the program, according to Jay.

Retailers can borrow as much as $2 million and are given the option of repaying the loans within a month, or under a one-year or two-year term. Jay said that Amex views the product as complementary to its small-business credit cards.

Square, based in San Francisco, charges its business customers a fixed percentage of the daily sales that they process through the company's payment network, so the borrower pays more when sales are higher and less when they sag. Merchants that are more active on Square are more likely to receive a credit offer, according to the company.

Square Capital, which launched in May 2014, remains smaller than some of its competitors. In April, Square provided nearly $25 million in small-business financing, according to a recent press release.

Seattle-based Amazon, which offers payment services to small businesses that sell products through Amazon Marketplace, launched its lending program in 2012. Last year Amazon hired Nick Talwar, the former head of Visa's North American credit card business, to run Amazon Lending, which is open to merchants on an invitation-only basis.

It makes sense for payment companies to lend to their business customers, particularly at a time when only a tiny percentage of loans are going bad, said William Phelan, president of PayNet, which provides credit ratings on small businesses.

He noted that the payment networks can see the early warning signs when a small business starts to struggle — for example, by delaying by a few days the payment of a business-credit-card bill.

But Phelan also warned that business lending could lead to big losses for payment firms during the next recession. That is in part because small-business owners often do not have deep pockets to tap when times get tough.

"Today it looks great, but we won't be in this benign credit environment forever," he said. "When bad things happen, they'll happen very, very quickly."

Many of the small companies that are turning to payment companies for loans are restaurants and other relatively risky ventures that likely could not get a bank loan. So the payment companies may pose a more direct threat to merchant cash advance firms, marketplace lenders that focus on small-business lending and other higher-cost financing sources.

Stephen Sheinbaum, chief executive officer of Merchant Cash and Capital, acknowledged the new competition, but noted that payment companies are underwriting small-business borrowers based on only the percentage of their sales that are processed on that particular network. That limits the size of their loans.

"Generally speaking, a merchant will be able to qualify for much more money from us," Sheinbaum said.

__._,_.___

Posted by: Jami Solli <jamisolli@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
WARNING! If you hit REPLY, your message will go to the entire listserve, not just the original author!

.

__,_._,___

Re: [MFP] Why are microfinance client numbers increasing?

 

Sophie and Richard,


You make an important point about SG members reaching out to financial institutions as individuals and financial institutions reaching out to them. I would be valuable to sturdy these connections which have occurred spontaneously to see which ones have proved valuable and useful and which have not. Most of these linkages will occur without us having much a say in how they are structured so it would good to know what is out there.

Jeff

Jeffrey Ashe
jaashe@aol.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Sophie Chitedze sophiechitedze@yahoo.com [MicrofinancePractice] <MicrofinancePractice@yahoogroups.com>
To: MicrofinancePractice <MicrofinancePractice@yahoogroups.com>; MFP <microfinancepractice@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: microfinanceheretic <microfinanceheretic@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, Jul 3, 2015 7:13 am
Subject: Re: [MFP] Why are microfinance client numbers increasing?

 
Dear Richard,

In my perspective, utilization of formal financial services (microfinance products) by poor clients such as members of Savings Groups is not an either/or option. When you and me have need of a place to securely save our funds or borrow a loan for whatever purposes, etc, banks are very accessible and close to us and are a very convenient daily aspect of our lives. The case is different with poor people located in remote locations and mostly organised in informal Savings Groups. Banks are out of reach, and in most cases do not even understand how they operate. So I guess the questions to be answered are: 

●What needs to happen to enable these poor Savings Group clients and financially excluded individuals access and utilise the various financial products conveniently when they decide or need to do so just like you and me? 

●Secondly, what needs to happen to ensure Financial Service Providers (FSPs) respond to these needs and serve these clients viably and sustainably? 

On the client side, what is needed is to ensure adequate client preparation, readiness, protection, empowerment to take own action by demanding the services and making the right choices, voice to advocate for pro poor finacial services policies to their benefit and financial literacy. It requires up to date statistics on numbers, scale and financial achievements to be communicated and issues requiring the need to link to banks....how to do so...etc

On the FSP side, the issues to address include; mission commitment to serve poor clients, investment in business-led approaches to developing this client market through innovative products that meet unique client needs, innovating efficient delivery channels to reach these remotely located clients conveniently, respect for client rights, building trust, capacity to scale, etc. 

Finally, we know that despite these debates, the day to day reality is that the poor seek external financial services with or without our support and our role as development practioners is therefore to ensure they benefit from these actions in an equal manner irrespective of their sex and livelihood status.  This becomes even more pertinent when women are brought into the equation. It requires a totally different way in tackling issues ....indeed quite different from the conventional way of doing things, while building on past experience.

You are raising very helpful questions and I am learning a lot from the discussions.

Best, 


Sophie


From:"richard chongo rigochongo@yahoo.co.uk [MicrofinancePractice]" <MicrofinancePractice@yahoogroups.com>
Date:Wed, 1 Jul, 2015 at 15:07
Subject:[MFP] Why are microfinance client numbers increasing?

 
Dear all,

Once again, I would like to tap from the great knowledge harbored in this group.

There has been a number of debates, posts, findings, thoughts, etc on the evils of micro-finance. People have argued that micro-finance does not result into any positive transformation for the people living in poverty, rather it worsens their (economic) situation. Examples have been drawn from Andhra Pradesh where micro-finance clients committed suicide to free themselves from the "angry" loan officers demanding their money back; also from some country in Asia where a woman sent her daughter into prostitution so that she can repay a loan to an "un-understanding" MFI which denies to restructure her loan or just write it off. So many other examples are found in Africa where clients are locked in offices until the repayment money comes. Apart from the clearly evident forms of "injustice" as these ones, other sectors have also argued that poor people are being robbed because of their ignorance where MFIs charge interest rates that are very high effectively having the potential to dwindle their economic growth. In fact Dr Jason Hickel says "micro-finance doesn't work"; and that "the micro-finance craze has been built on "foundations of sand" because "no clear evidence yet exists that micro-finance programs have positive impacts."" Of course many would agree that, just because there is lack of clear evidence on the positive impact of micro-finance, does not mean micro-finance has zero or negative impact.

Regardless of the above thoughts, it seems the number of micro-finance clients keeps on growing, especially in these times when people have realized that micro-finance does not equal to micro-credit. Micro-credit, just as micro-savings, micro-insurance, etc, are just components within micro-finance sector.

1. Do these growing numbers mean that the clients themselves do not see these evils? Or maybe should we assume that micro-finance clients are ignorant or too poor to notice these "exploitative" endeavors?

2. When a micro-credit client invests his/her loan funds into a micro-business, and the business fails to pick-up, is it micro-finance to blame?

3. Is it the whole of micro-finance industry that is to blame? Or there are few components within the industry that invite these criticisms?

.............................

I believe that micro-finance is not a magic bullet that can kill ALL causes and effects of poverty. However, I think that it creates opportunities for people living in poverty, and mostly excluded from financial solutions, to try their luck in the world of financial services. Definitely, some will make it and some will fall along the way but the idea is to get everyone to the "positive transformation" goal. I liked a comment from my friend Tim when we chatted on this issue. He said, 

    " I certainly do agree that micro-finance is not a solution to poverty.  However, I am still hopeful that it     provides a platform from which solutions may arise.  Like any type of financial intervention it grants people     access.  The real work is in the hands of the customers.  In the end it will be their ingenuity, creativity     and hard work that advances their livelihoods. Micro-finance just helps level the playing field (if only a     little) so that the riskier clientele can access the same things that the wealthy do"

I think that micro-finance clients, though poor, are able to make financial decisions that affect their lives. Just as in the corporate world, some people will make decisions that will not go according to their expectations. What micro-finance does is to provide opportunities for poor people to access financial services (both in terms of physical presence of financial services and simplifying processes for a rural poor woman to transact with a financial service provider). A decision to USE these services now rests in the hands of the client.

Nevertheless, I do agree that the extent to which micro-finance clients can make informed financial service usage decision might be a bit limited. This is due to the fact that these services might be new in their context. Since there are numerous examples of the advantages of micro-finance, I think concentrating on training these clients to be able to distinguish between a good micro-finance service and a bad service would be an ideal step to take.

I think that when a client gets a first loan from an MFI, and s/he comes back for a second one, one of the possible reasons would be s/he satisfied by what s/he benefits from the MFI. It would also be nice to understand the net promoter score in the micro-finance industry. If it is negative, then pheew there is no future. If it is positive, and thankfully higher then it would mean the clients are happy with the benefits that they get from the MFIs are are able to recommend others in their circles to join.

Disclaimer: I do not intend to invalidate the points that critics of micro-finance make. I personally salute their efforts because they help to shape a good direction for micro-finance industry and basically because they mean well. I have never come across a critic that fights for eradication of micro-finance, they all point out the negatives of which if addressed, the industry would be a better place.




__._,_.___

Posted by: jaashe@aol.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (3)
WARNING! If you hit REPLY, your message will go to the entire listserve, not just the original author!

.

__,_._,___