Derek -- these are interesting observations for sure. But on the one point of loan cover insurance, I'm having a hard time seeing this as a client-oriented product. I get that clients are concerned about loans in the event they die or become incapacitated, but is that a reflection of client need or the result of MFI practices? Let me propose a simple concept -- in the event a client dies or becomes incapacitated, the loan should die too. After all, the loan is a contract between the MFI and the client, not her family. Likewise, a group might be expected to vouch for clients' credit-worthiness, but should they be expected to vouch for clients' longevity as well?
Posted by: danrozas@yahoo.com
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (21) |
No comments:
Post a Comment